Romo who?
Re: Romo who?
Jerry Jones said Romo is still their #1 quarterback... I guess that means he's going to start Sunday.
Re: Romo who?
Romo is... correction... was a great quarterback for the Cowboys. However, based on what I've heard, he's thrown a lot of interceptions lately.
Denver Broncos - AFC West
Green Bay Packers - NFC North
New England Patriots - AFC East
Seattle Seahawks - NFC West
Pittsburg Steelers - AFC North
Dallas Cowboys - NFC East
Indianapolis Colts - AFC South
New Orleans Saints - NFC South
Green Bay Packers - NFC North
New England Patriots - AFC East
Seattle Seahawks - NFC West
Pittsburg Steelers - AFC North
Dallas Cowboys - NFC East
Indianapolis Colts - AFC South
New Orleans Saints - NFC South
Re: Romo who?
Aurorans wrote:Romo is... correction... was a great quarterback for the Cowboys. However, based on what I've heard, he's thrown a lot of interceptions lately.
He hasn't played for 8 weeks...
- AaronS
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:31 pm
- Location: The Green Dragon, Hobbiton
Re: Romo who?
elguapo wrote:You're assuming that Romo's carreer is over when comparing INTs to touchdowns. According to experts Romo has a few more years to surpass Montana and Aikman.
Now all those QBs you listed have had a tougher schedule in their careers so naturally their INTs to touchdowns would be higher than Romo's since Romo has had a much softer schedule throughtout his carrer. So if you think about it, Romo's INT to touchdown ratio is too high for a QB that has played a much softer schedule throught his career.
If you're calling for Romo to be benched for throwing INTs, Brees should be benched, MANNING, Big Ben. All those guys throw/threw the same amount of INTs by volume. That's not my opinion, that is what the stats bear out.
Rodgers, Brady and Russell Wilson would be the only guys who should be starting using your logic.
And schedule?
Manning played in the weakest division I've ever seen. He beat up on the weak sisters of the poor and won 10+ games every year. Same with Rodgers and Brady.
Meanwhile, the Giants won 2 Super Bowls during Romos run. The Eagles made the Playoffs how many times under Andy Reid? Even the Skins had a nice run when Gibbs came back.
The same set of standards should be applied to everyone. The arguments you're trying to present against Romo don't have any merit. All I see is a blatant bias or flat out dislike. And that's totally fine. But just own that.
I'm sure we agree on the fact that Romo won't win a Super Bowl. But you can't convince me he isn't a good QB. His numbers prove beyond any doubt that he is.
Re: Romo who?
WHAT A GAME ! BOYS BEAT PITT
Re: Romo who?
snoman909 wrote:WHAT A GAME ! BOYS BEAT PITT
Yep, that one was pretty exiting. Too bad my Pats couldn't get a win...
- AaronS
- Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1022
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 10:31 pm
- Location: The Green Dragon, Hobbiton
Re: Romo who?
Classy move. Probably scored some points with his suitors for next year.
Ride the wave. Maybe it will pay off as it did for Drew Bledsoe.
Ride the wave. Maybe it will pay off as it did for Drew Bledsoe.
Re: Romo who?
Who was that guy on the podium saying he won't be remembered by his stats?
Re: Romo who?
AaronS wrote:Classy move. Probably scored some points with his suitors for next year.
Ride the wave. Maybe it will pay off as it did for Drew Bledsoe.
There definitely are many similarities between the two situations.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests