mee wrote:JSamuel wrote:I'm a little confused, since it now says I am a "Veteran."
I don't see that one in your list.
My bad..
Rookie 0-24
Veteran 25-49
Pro Bowl 50-99
All-Pro 100-499
MVP 500-1000
Hall of Fame 1000-4999
Legend 5000+
No sweat.
mee wrote:JSamuel wrote:I'm a little confused, since it now says I am a "Veteran."
I don't see that one in your list.
My bad..
Rookie 0-24
Veteran 25-49
Pro Bowl 50-99
All-Pro 100-499
MVP 500-1000
Hall of Fame 1000-4999
Legend 5000+
mee wrote:JSamuel wrote:I'm a little confused, since it now says I am a "Veteran."
I don't see that one in your list.
My bad..
Rookie 0-24
Veteran 25-49
Pro Bowl 50-99
All-Pro 100-499
MVP 500-1000
Hall of Fame 1000-4999
Legend 5000+
RevanFan wrote:I knew I included that! Though, the post counts should probably be different.
RevanFan wrote:I'm actually thinking of changing those rankings. How does this sound?
Rookie 0-49
Veteran 50-99
Pro Bowl 100-499
All-Pro 500-1000
MVP 1000-2499
Hall of Fame 2500-4999
Legend 5000+
elguapo wrote:A point system would be better served if they were based on the quality of the post instead of the quantity of posts.
GeneralSilent wrote:elguapo wrote:A point system would be better served if they were based on the quality of the post instead of the quantity of posts.
How would that work? That sounds very complicated.
JSamuel wrote:GeneralSilent wrote:elguapo wrote:A point system would be better served if they were based on the quality of the post instead of the quantity of posts.
How would that work? That sounds very complicated.
There's no way that would work.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests